During his State of the Union address in January 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson unveiled his plans to address the nation’s poverty, which then hovered at a rate of nineteen percent. The major legislative initiatives in what became known as the War on Poverty included the Food Stamp Act, the Social Security Act (which created Medicare and Medicaid), and the Economic Opportunity Act (which created Job Corps and the Volunteers in Service to America programs). This year marks the 50th anniversary of War on Poverty and, as with most historical anniversaries, both the media and scholars have weighed in with critiques and analyses of its legacy, often leading to statements about how we, as a nation, have lost the war on poverty.
But will any of it make a difference in how we view those in poverty? And will we continue to dismiss the real struggles of the men, women, and children living in poverty with biased and uninformed assumptions about their bad decisions, their alleged laziness, or their desire to live off the government?
Very often, stories and images of Appalachia are used to illustrate the nation’s poverty. This was the case in the 1960s and it’s still this way today. The New York Times does so with regularity. (See, for example, this article or this one.)
But hope abounds.
There’s a terrific documentary photography project called Looking at Appalachia that operates from a different set of assumptions. Poverty is not just about statistics, it’s about human beings. More than that, poverty is not always a choice. And as for Appalachia, despite its issues with poverty, it is also home. The images from this project reflect the beauty of the landscape and the people without succumbing to stereotype. And here is where art makes a difference.
As the Looking at Appalachia project notes:
“Many of the War on Poverty photographs, whether intentional or not, became a visual definition of Appalachia. These images have often drawn from the poorest areas and people to gain support for the intended cause, but unjustly came to represent the entirety of the region while simultaneously perpetuating stereotypes.”
The project’s director, Roger May, is a documentary photographer from the Tug Valley region of southern West Virginia and eastern Kentucky. I asked Roger about how his project might help to dispel these stereotypes:
“Well, it’s important to realize that this project can’t or won’t single-handedly dispel decades worth of stacked myths and stereotypes. We all know how powerful images can be. We certainly didn’t get here overnight, so I don’t think we’ll reverse course that quickly either. What I like about the idea of this project is that it’s purpose isn’t to negate those pictures and ideas, but rather hopefully it’ll dilute them to a point that folks who both are, and aren’t, familiar with Appalachia will have another frame of reference for people and place. I see these photographs as added voices to a conversation that started well before the War on Poverty was declared and ones that’ll be around for a long while to come. We can’t ignore stereotypes and at the same time, we can’t deny elements of truth in them. What we can do is keep our hands to the plow of reminding folks that people are people no matter where you go. If we’re collectively willing to sit a while, listen, and try to understand on an individual level, we might surprise ourselves with what we find.”
And what has been the impact of this project so far?
“The impact I’ve noticed from the project so far has been positive. Folks seem to be generally excited about Appalachia being shown in a different light, a more modern take on a place we all tend to see stuck in the past. Appalachia is one of those places that’s easy to romanticize and quite often the “othering” that happens there is, I think, somewhat self-induced. That’s really OK, but I think it’s important to pursue and embrace change, whatever that might look like. Traditions don’t have to be sacrificed for modernity, but let’s be truthful in our representations.”
Aside from the project’s website, what are your plans for extending the life of the project?
“In early 2015, I’ll be working with the project’s editorial and advisory boards to work through the online images and make selections for print. We’ll be coordinating with galleries, colleges, and universities throughout the Appalachian and outlying regions to host exhibitions of the work and would like to see it travel throughout 2015 and 2016. I’d love to see a companion catalog of work release next year as well, but funding will dictate most of this. At this point, we haven’t secured an grants or private donations. Moving forward, I plan to continue the project as long as there’s an interest and folks are willing to submit images. I’d also very much like to see a quarterly print publication evolve from this.”
I encourage readers of Pop South to take visit the Looking at Appalachia website as well as Roger May’s personal site called Walk your camera.
One final note from Roger: I’d just really like to take an opportunity to thank the folks who have helped so much with this project behind the scenes and who helped get it off the ground. Aaron Blum, Kate Fowler, Chris Fowler, Raymond Thompson Jr., Megan King, Susan Worsham, Pat Jarrett, John Edwin Mason, Pete Brook, Joy Salyers, Elaine McMillion Sheldon, Rob Amberg, Nic Persinger, and many, many others. This project couldn’t move forward without their help and support. And of course, all the photographers who have submitted work so far. This project belongs to everyone.
5 thoughts on “Looking at Appalachia: Fifty years after the War on Poverty”
Swathes of Appalachia may still be classified as poor, but it is dramatically better off than it was 50 years ago. I live in the South but have not traveled extensively through Appalachia; still, I would venture that nearly every home has running water, television and phone service, and nearly all families have cars. This was far from the case five decades ago. There are still issues with poverty, but poverty is a moving target, and some of the people classified as poor now would not have been considered so in 1964.
Most important is your statement that this region is home to those that live there. Of course, it’s not home to the New York Times reporter and photographer who drop in for a week in search of down-and-out towns to portray the region in a negative light. You don’t win journalism awards by writing stories that highlight the fact that some social programs are working and have to concede that perhaps the people of Appalachia are making progress and might actually be living fulfilling lives.
Thanks for your comment. More than anything, I really appreciate this photography project that seeks to humanize the people of Appalachia.
Indeed, it’s nice when someone attempts to portray a region in something besides one dimension.
I have spent 59 of my 63 years in Appalachia between Charleston, West Virginia and Woodstock, Georgia. It seems to me the pockets of poor are concentrated in West Virginia proportionately more than the other states, ironically West Virginia is the only state that is completely within the boundaries of the Appalachian Mountains. I think the War on Poverty will continue in the state (WV) because the coal industry’s battles with regulations from the EPA and the lower costs of natural gas.
What was once considered a luxury (running water, automobiles, televisions and phones) is not relevant when we take into consideration, according to an inflation calculator, $20.00 in 1965 is equivalent to $150.49 today and that is a cumulative rate of inflation change of 652.4%. Then the unemployment rates are excessively higher than the national average and education is not even close to the national level as well. Poverty levels are determined by much more than I can express in a post, but I want to thank you Dr. Cox for the enlightening blog.
And yet, it is still home. Thank you for your thoughtful reply to the post.